Manual Accessibility Testing Vs Automated Accessibility Testing
The demand for accesibility testing is increasing as businesses become more aware of the need for accessible websites. While automated accessibility testing tools are helpful for quickly checking large volumes of content, they cannot replace manual testing when it comes to identifying nuanced design and navigation issues. This is why manual accessibility testing is still essential to web development.
Accessibility Testing
Automated Testing
Automated testing tools are commonly used to scan websites for accessibility issues. They are efficient for checking large websites but have limitations. Some areas where automated testing often falls short include screen reader compatibility, color adjustments, page titles, proper coding, keyboard-only navigation, and determining if a site is optimized for keyboard functionality. Sometimes, automated testing tools can produce false positives and negatives.
Optimizing Automated Testing
Automated testing reports may also generate false positives or negatives. Some common false negatives occur in areas such as structure and presentation, alternative text, color contrast with images, and non-distinguishable links. Automated tools are unable to understand the context or purpose of content, accurately assess alternative text descriptions, detect color contrast issues with images against background images, and determine if the link text is distinguishable.
Setting The Stage for Manual Accessibility Testing
Manual Testing
Manual Accessibility Testing
Before conducting manual accessibility testing, setting up the testing environment is essential. This involves configuring browsers and assistive technologies to test accessibility effectively. Additionally, creating test plans and checklists ensures a streamlined testing process. A well-organized testing environment is necessary to obtain accurate and reliable results.
Conducting Manual Accessibility Testing: Use Cases
Testing Web Page Structure And Navigation
- Analyzing the heading structure to establish a clear content hierarchy.
- Ensuring proper semantic markup that aids screen reader understanding.
- Evaluating keyboard accessibility and focus management to enhance navigation.
Testing Images And Multimedia
- Verifying alternative text (alt-text) for images, audio, and video content.
- Ensuring accessible multimedia controls and captions for a diverse audience.
Testing Forms and Interactions
- Validating form labels, input fields, and error messages for clarity.
- Verifying accessible interactions such as dropdowns and accordions for keyboard and screen reader users.
Testing Color And Contrast
- Assessing color usage for readability and compliance with contrast guidelines.
- Addressing issues related to color blindness and low vision users to enhance visual accessibility.
Benefits Of Manual Accessibility Testing
- Detailed examination of complex accessibility aspects that automated tools might miss.
- Greater accuracy in identifying accessibility issues and providing appropriate solutions.
- Improved user experiences for all individuals, including those with disabilities.
Challenges And Tips For Successful Manual Testing
- Familiarize yourself with accessibility guidelines such as Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG).
- Create a diverse team with individuals who have different perspectives and experiences to ensure inclusive testing.
- Use checklists and test plans to maintain consistency and cover all necessary testing areas.
- Keep yourself updated with the latest accessibility standards and techniques to stay ahead in testing.
Overcoming Common Challenges
Efficiency and Effectiveness
Collaborative Approaches
Involving individuals with disabilities, accessibility experts, and developers in the testing process enriches the evaluation and enhances the overall accessibility of digital content.